Tuesday, May 24, 2011

"Pain is character distortion...simply not necessary."



An interesting discussion of E-Prime.
Though he doesn't endorse the practice and refers to those who im(EX)plore the method as a "cult", it was relevant in the broad sense of how it functions.
The true value is found in the residual qualities left from extensive periods of practice.



Liber Vel Jugorum is, in a sense, a predecessor to E-Prime. Author Robert Anton Wilson credits and cites Crowley's work throughout his life work. In Crowley's exercise he suggests the practice to endure only long enough until mastery. Mastery simply put would be a flawless use of filtering censorship resulting in live time without distorting the efficiency of the cognitive processes. This is traditionally accomplished with two weeks.

To reiterate: The true value is found in the residual qualities left from extensive periods of practice.

What is so often found is that the initial period of experimentation brings forward significant frustration and eventually it will question the integrity of the operators initial hypothesis. Many at this point begin conversing with the resistant ego and concede to either "this is pointless" or perhaps "you have mastered this or got the general idea". If the experimenter gives in to these "suggestions", (S)he will find little to no significant quality gained, and ultimately discontent with the performance of the practice. Left unimpressed and true to the persistant nature of their programming, the wanderer continues to stall.

Stalling is character distortion, simply not necessary.

Again, the process should be engaged until the operator feels as if the practice is not cumbersome on the efficiency of thought. Once the operator is performing with little to no latency with the language restrictions in place, the practice may be put aside for a period of time. Now, after returning to the familiar rules of traditional communication, the experimenter will observe the residual benefits of the method. Though the symptoms can be quite unique to the user, there are some generally common reflections:

1.An enhanced sense of agility while engaged in conversation. A nimbleness is detected when language construction appeals to the individual's lexicon. A measure of expansion in the breadth of vernacular usage can be noted.

2.When listening to patterns in transmissions sent from others, an almost automatic disassociation occurs between the words and the symbolism being conveyed by the speaker. After scrutinizing the language of the internal dialogue with such harsh diligence, it is almost impossible not to analyze the messages delivered by others. Opinions are quickly detected with an almost automatic response and dispatched accordingly. Facts are just as easily deciphered and assimilated as well. This allows for significant strides in oration when exploring concepts rather than facts. Be careful not to dominate with Socratic analysis, for this agility has a half life. When it runs out, you remain a pompous ass.

3.Quality not quantity. The practice is tiresome and frustration remains present all the way until the end. During the practice the user will find that normal worthless discourse is simply too tiring and will eventually evade the temptations of trivial verbosity. Initially, it may be considered an act of laziness during the experiment, a way of avoiding the exercise, but this is not a negative disposition later on. Upon completion of the method, the user will continue to monitor the quality of the subject matter being contemplated before actually speaking. A nip in the bud for the persistant logorrhea most of us experience. This reservation also has a half life: be aware of the pitfalls of becoming obsessed with the value of conversation and severely questioning the ambiguity of speaking. ...Which leads this discussion to the hazards of fucking with the programming...


"Language is a virus."- The Ticket That Exploded By William S. Burroughs


The parallels between computer programming and Nuero-linguistic programming should be considered before participating in the active manipulation of the operators software. In meta-programming there are some rules to follow to ensure successful architecture capable of supporting the complex yet fragile weight of the human mind. Please refer to this link to address any semantic issues that may arise further in this discussion: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Metaprogramming

Burroughs taught the cut-up technique to Genesis P-Orridge as a method for "altering reality".

Just as the DreamMachine seems like a good idea until you realise you are an epileptic, so should one approach the practice with metaprogramming.

There takes a special internal motivation that is possessed by those of us who are even open to the postulations these experiments propose. This internal drive toward evolution can lead us into a vivid state of confusion. Just as Burroughs stated the nature of language as a virus, nothing seems more affective from these endeavors than the insanity of Though Disorders.

Burroughs and Gysin developed the cut up technique utilizing the language template they had on hand: English. This served as both the substrate and template for further manipulation. Though experimenting with fresh individual substrate (i.e. sigils,symbolic talismans,runes) is encouraged, it should be introduced after a template has been corrupted. Why?

It is only a suggestion, but through many attempts it has been a shared experience amongst psychonauts that frequent contact with dissociative states occurs when utilizing user created semantics. This dissociative state usually accompanies a state of alienation towards others and with the psyche as well. This schizophrenic confusion can be quite uncomfortable and can be avoided if one utilizes the garbage at hand. The Aghori find that every manifestation of beauty resembles the simultaneous hideousness and divinity of our lord Shiva.

This activity is to merge higher consciousness with this current incarnation. Not to apprehend one mode and develop an insufficient apparatus to replace another. The emphasis is to interconnect multiple grides of synaptic patterns and not abandoning explored territory. To enhance and evolve the machine to assist the desire of our True Will. Creation requires new technology to be introduced and fitted to allow higher functionality. Now...

Smash the control images — Smash the control machine

There are various ways and techniques to introduce your own cancer into the body of language that constitutes as your source code.
From Wiki: "The language in which the metaprogram is written is called the metalanguage. The language of the programs that are manipulated is called the object language. The ability of a programming language to be its own metalanguage is called reflection or reflexivity.
Reflection is a valuable language feature to facilitate metaprogramming. Having the programming language itself as a first-class data type (as in Lisp, Forth or Rebol) is also very useful. Generic programming invokes a metaprogramming facility within a language, in those languages supporting it."

Communication is a vary clever tool for the clandestine cultural engineer. Learning how to utilize cipher and create abstractions out of clearly defined language rules is a wonderful influence to derail conditioning amongst those who interact with us. Reread that and every other strange sentence sequence previously embedded in this essay to further understand.

Writing is another fantastic way of creating and destroying symbol/word associations. Thee Psychick Bible is littered with this.
Read these for further instruction:






Find more methods and corrupt them with your self.

Many attempt to short circuit language with various prescriptions and users are encourage to participate with all practices and methods specifically tailored to their individual needs. With diligence and commitment simple practices can be mastered with minimal internal conflict and maximal effect. The Bodhisattvah remains as a compassionate interaction amongst all. By applying common language and diverging collectively, the influence can become extreme. Perhaps leading to full sigilisation.

In biological terms we are rhizomes. Fucking and spreading our infected memes amongst all. Making violent transitions from sleeper cells into active Agents of chaos or free radicals. In turn, these radicals can start chain reactions. When the chain reaction occurs in a cell, it can cause damage or death. Occasionally, even adaptations.